The Houston Texans have just made a bold move that’s sure to shake up their backfield—and it’s leaving fans with one big question: What does this mean for Joe Mixon and Nick Chubb? With the arrival of David Montgomery, the Texans are sending a clear message: There’s no room for their seasoned running backs anymore. But here’s where it gets controversial—is this the right strategy for a team that’s been leaning heavily on older players in recent years?
Let’s break it down. The Texans have a peculiar fondness for veteran running backs, but their latest acquisition, David Montgomery, who’s nearing 30, seems to slam the door shut on Joe Mixon and Nick Chubb. Montgomery’s trade to Houston, set to finalize next Wednesday, effectively ends any chance of Mixon or Chubb returning in 2026. And this is the part most people miss—it’s not just about age; it’s about the Texans’ evolving strategy at the running back position.
Mixon, who spent the entire 2025 season on the non-football injury list due to a mysterious foot injury, is almost certain to be released. Chubb, a free agent after rushing for 506 yards in 15 games last season, will likely explore opportunities elsewhere. Both players, now in their 30s, would only return to Houston if they remain unsigned and an injury creates an unexpected opening—a long shot, at best.
The Texans’ depth chart now clearly belongs to Montgomery and the younger Woody Marks, who impressed with 703 rushing yards as a rookie. Montgomery, set to earn $6 million this year and $9 million in 2027, will be the veteran presence while Marks continues to develop. But here’s the kicker: The Texans gave up significant assets, including a fourth-round pick, for a 29-year-old running back. Is this a wise investment, or are they doubling down on a strategy that’s already raising eyebrows?
What’s even more intriguing is the timing. The Texans struck this deal on the first business day after the Scouting Combine, suggesting they carefully weighed their free-agent options and decided Montgomery was the safer, more cost-effective choice compared to top free-agent running backs. Yet, they’re still committing to an older player while simultaneously overhauling their offensive line year after year—a strategy that’s as curious as it is bold.
But here’s the real question: Are the Texans building for the future, or are they stuck in a cycle of relying on veterans? Montgomery and Marks give them a mix of experience and youth, but at what cost? And with Chubb and Mixon now on the outs, is this a missed opportunity to retain proven talent? Let us know what you think in the comments—do the Texans have the right approach, or are they making a risky bet on an aging backfield?
